In-Text |
But admit that they be only Peters successours, that sit in Peters seat, séeing the stories affirme that Peter had two seats, at Antioche, and at Rome: why should not his successours at Antioch, enioy this prerogatiue as wel as his successors at Rome? That Peter was at Antioch, wée finde in the scripture, that hée was at Rome, wée finde not, |
But admit that they be only Peter's Successors, that fit in Peter's seat, seeing the stories affirm that Peter had two seats, At Antioch, and At Room: why should not his Successors At Antioch, enjoy this prerogative as well as his Successors At Room? That Peter was At Antioch, we find in the scripture, that he was At Room, we find not, |
cc-acp vvb cst pns32 vbb av-j npg1 n2, cst vvb p-acp npg1 n1, vvg dt n2 vvb cst np1 vhd crd n2, p-acp np1, cc p-acp vvi: q-crq vmd xx po31 n2 p-acp np1, vvb d n1 c-acp av c-acp po31 n2 p-acp vvi? cst np1 vbds p-acp np1, pns12 vvb p-acp dt n1, cst pns31 vbds p-acp vvb, pns12 vvb xx, |