In-Text |
Will they say ▪ 〈 ◊ 〉 Prince may loose Ius regni, the right of his kingdome, per 〈 ◊ 〉 regnandi, by raigning with iniustice & 〈 ◊ 〉? and so they are absolued of their obedience? But how haps it that the Scripture neuer knew this distinction? Saul though guiltie of all sinnes against the first Table yet exsolo 〈 ◊ 〉 • … is ch• … ctere, might not bee deposed: |
Will they say ▪ 〈 ◊ 〉 Prince may lose Just Regni, the right of his Kingdom, per 〈 ◊ 〉 regnandi, by reigning with injustice & 〈 ◊ 〉? and so they Are absolved of their Obedience? But how haps it that the Scripture never knew this distinction? Saul though guilty of all Sins against the First Table yet exsolo 〈 ◊ 〉 • … is ch• … ctere, might not be deposed: |
n1 pns32 vvi ▪ 〈 sy 〉 n1 vmb vvi np1 fw-la, dt n-jn pp-f po31 n1, fw-la 〈 sy 〉 fw-la, p-acp vvg p-acp n1 cc 〈 sy 〉? cc av pns32 vbr vvn pp-f po32 n1? p-acp q-crq vvz pn31 cst dt n1 av-x vvd d n1? np1 cs j pp-f d n2 p-acp dt ord n1 av uh 〈 sy 〉 • … vbz n1 … fw-la, vmd xx vbi vvn: |