In-Text |
That the Bishop of Rome is Peters successor (whereuppon dependeth the whole state and substance of their supremasie) is not at all declared in holye Scripture but is prooued by other meanes, wherein, besides the irrecouerable foyle hee geueth to that, their ruinous and declining cause, hee is flatlye agaynst Stapleton who in the sixt booke and fifteenth Chapiter of his forenamed Controuersies, of purpose (though indeede to little purpose) there vndertaketh to prooue the same by Scripture. |
That the Bishop of Rome is Peter's successor (whereupon dependeth the Whole state and substance of their supremacy) is not At all declared in holy Scripture but is proved by other means, wherein, beside the irrecoverable foil he Giveth to that, their ruinous and declining cause, he is flatly against Stapleton who in the sixt book and fifteenth Chapter of his forenamed Controversies, of purpose (though indeed to little purpose) there undertaketh to prove the same by Scripture. |
cst dt n1 pp-f np1 vbz npg1 n1 (c-crq vvz dt j-jn n1 cc n1 pp-f po32 n1) vbz xx p-acp d vvd p-acp j n1 cc-acp vbz vvn p-acp j-jn n2, c-crq, p-acp dt j n1 pns31 vvz p-acp d, po32 j cc j-vvg n1, pns31 vbz av-j p-acp np1 r-crq p-acp dt ord n1 cc ord n1 pp-f po31 j-vvn n2, pp-f n1 (cs av p-acp j n1) pc-acp vvz pc-acp vvi dt d p-acp n1. |