In-Text |
and of the end of the world? But this question, though not so intended by them, was fallacia ad plures interrogationes, a question consisting of two parts, one so different from the other that one and the same answer could not befit both; |
and of the end of the world? But this question, though not so intended by them, was Fallacy ad plures interrogationes, a question consisting of two parts, one so different from the other that one and the same answer could not befit both; |
cc pp-f dt n1 pp-f dt n1? p-acp d n1, cs xx av vvn p-acp pno32, vbds fw-it fw-la fw-la fw-la, dt n1 vvg pp-f crd n2, pi av j p-acp dt n-jn cst crd cc dt d n1 vmd xx vvi d; |