| In-Text |
Yet euen this last Position, is not sound, vnlesse we stretch it, to a large latepatencie For the faith of the Romans, was spoken-of, throughout the whole world, Rom. 1.8. |
Yet even this last Position, is not found, unless we stretch it, to a large latepatencie For the faith of the Roman, was spoken-of, throughout the Whole world, Rom. 1.8. |
av av d ord n1, vbz xx j, cs pns12 vvb pn31, p-acp dt j n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt njp2, vbds j, p-acp dt j-jn n1, np1 crd. |
| Note 0 |
Scotus dislikes it; and though Conrade Koellin, on Aquin. 1•, 2 ae. Quaest. 103, taxeth Scotus, that he tooke nor aright, what Augustine and Thomas vnderstand, by the Diuulgation of the Gospell; and thereupon distinguisheth, There is a double Publication of the Gospell, Vna imperfecta, quando per Apostolos & alios praedicati erant Articuli fidei, and the Necessitie of the Sacraments of the New-Law, and of the Praecepts of Christ. The other is the perfect Promulgation of the Gospell, where the afore-said thinges were preached, and the sufficiencie of the New-Law without the Legals, and the inutilitie, yea hurt of the Legals. After this Publication, Aquin meaneth, it was not lawfull to obserue the Legals as Sacraments; and Scotus opposeth not this, saith Koellin: yet he himselfe is too blame, first, in making an imperfect Preaching of the Apostles, which was most perfect, though indeed not so large, or full. Secondly, in mistaking Aquinas, who saith not any where, it was lawfull to obserue the Legalls as Sacraments, at any time, betweene Christ's Death, and the full promulgation of the Gospell. For it was at no time lawfull, aftèr the Death of Christ, to vse them, as Sacraments, and so the heart of his distinction is broken, which makes is vnlawfull, to vse Legals, as Sacraments, after the inlarged Promulgation, which was meerely vnlawfull, at the first, or breifer Publication: |
Scotus dislikes it; and though Conrade Koellin, on Aquinas 1•, 2 ae. Question 103, Taxes Scotus, that he took nor aright, what Augustine and Thomas understand, by the Divulgation of the Gospel; and thereupon Distinguisheth, There is a double Publication of the Gospel, Una Imperfect, quando per Apostles & Alioth praedicati Erant Articuli fidei, and the Necessity of the Sacraments of the New-Law, and of the Precepts of christ. The other is the perfect Promulgation of the Gospel, where the aforesaid things were preached, and the sufficiency of the New-Law without the Legals, and the inutility, yea hurt of the Legals. After this Publication, Aquinas means, it was not lawful to observe the Legals as Sacraments; and Scotus Opposeth not this, Says Koellin: yet he himself is too blame, First, in making an imperfect Preaching of the Apostles, which was most perfect, though indeed not so large, or full. Secondly, in mistaking Aquinas, who Says not any where, it was lawful to observe the Legalls as Sacraments, At any time, between Christ's Death, and the full Promulgation of the Gospel. For it was At no time lawful, aftèr the Death of christ, to use them, as Sacraments, and so the heart of his distinction is broken, which makes is unlawful, to use Legals, as Sacraments, After the enlarged Promulgation, which was merely unlawful, At the First, or breifer Publication: |
np1 vvz pn31; cc cs np1 np1, p-acp np1 n1, crd fw-la. np1 crd, vvz np1, cst pns31 vvd ccx av, r-crq np1 cc np1 vvb, p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1; cc av vvz, pc-acp vbz dt j-jn n1 pp-f dt n1, np1 fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la cc n2 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, cc dt n1 pp-f dt n2 pp-f dt n1, cc pp-f dt n2 pp-f np1. dt n-jn vbz dt j n1 pp-f dt n1, c-crq dt j n2 vbdr vvn, cc dt n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp dt npg1, cc dt n1, uh n1 pp-f dt npg1. p-acp d n1, np1 vvz, pn31 vbds xx j pc-acp vvi dt npg1 p-acp n2; cc np1 vvz xx d, vvz np1: av pns31 px31 vbz av n1, ord, p-acp vvg dt j vvg pp-f dt n2, r-crq vbds av-ds j, cs av xx av j, cc j. ord, p-acp vvg np1, r-crq vvz xx d c-crq, pn31 vbds j pc-acp vvi dt npg1 p-acp n2, p-acp d n1, p-acp npg1 n1, cc dt j n1 pp-f dt n1. p-acp pn31 vbds p-acp dx n1 j, vvb dt n1 pp-f np1, pc-acp vvi pno32, c-acp n2, cc av dt n1 pp-f po31 n1 vbz vvn, r-crq vvz vbz j, pc-acp vvi npg1, c-acp n2, p-acp dt vvn n1, r-crq vbds av-j j, p-acp dt ord, cc n1 n1: |
