In-Text |
How vntrue therefore is it that the signes are of no force, except the thing signified, being in deede also present bee coupled and ioyned with the signe? Yea shall we say, that the water of Baptisme, is an idle signe? & yet I neuer hard of any man that would say, that the bloud of Christ was indeede consubstantiated together wyth the wine. |
How untrue Therefore is it that the Signs Are of no force, except the thing signified, being in deed also present be coupled and joined with the Signen? Yea shall we say, that the water of Baptism, is an idle Signen? & yet I never hard of any man that would say, that the blood of christ was indeed consubstantiated together with the wine. |
q-crq j av vbz pn31 cst dt n2 vbr pp-f dx n1, c-acp dt n1 vvd, vbg p-acp n1 av j vbi vvn cc vvn p-acp dt n1? uh vmb pns12 vvi, cst dt n1 pp-f n1, vbz dt j n1? cc av pns11 av-x j pp-f d n1 cst vmd vvi, cst dt n1 pp-f np1 vbds av vvn av p-acp dt n1. |
Note 0 |
2 A second reson, standing vpon comparison of the element of baptisme, with the elements of the supper. |
2 A second Reason's, standing upon comparison of the element of Baptism, with the elements of the supper. |
crd dt ord ng1, vvg p-acp n1 pp-f dt n1 pp-f n1, p-acp dt n2 pp-f dt n1. |