In-Text |
vvere he not, if not in vvit a very dolt & asse, yet surely in diuinitie a very simple one, vvho vvould attribute such miraculous excellencie to the ceremonies of Moses lavv, vvhich them selues notvvithstanding al their hyperbol cal & l•ing florishes, meane not to be true no not in the gospel? And vvhat so euer they meane, the vniuersal scope and drift of scripture denieth & refuteth it in the old lavv most effectually? |
were he not, if not in wit a very dolt & Ass, yet surely in divinity a very simple one, who would attribute such miraculous excellency to the ceremonies of Moses law, which them selves notwithstanding all their hyperbol call & l•ing flourishes, mean not to be true no not in the gospel? And what so ever they mean, the universal scope and drift of scripture Denieth & refuteth it in the old law most effectually? |
vbdr pns31 xx, cs xx p-acp n1 dt j n1 cc n1, av av-j p-acp n1 dt j j pi, r-crq vmd vvi d j n1 p-acp dt n2 pp-f np1 n1, r-crq pno32 n2 a-acp d po32 n1 vvi cc vvi n2, vvb xx pc-acp vbi j av-dx xx p-acp dt n1? cc q-crq av av pns32 vvb, dt j-u n1 cc n1 pp-f n1 vvz cc vvz pn31 p-acp dt j n1 av-ds av-j? |