In-Text |
And yet if that may bee drawen to any argument, it proves onely that hee was Lapis primus, the first in order and in forwardnesse to preach Christ (as it became him who had three times denied him) but not Lapis primarius, the chiefe in dignity, |
And yet if that may be drawn to any argument, it Proves only that he was Lapis primus, the First in order and in forwardness to preach christ (as it became him who had three times denied him) but not Lapis Primarius, the chief in dignity, |
cc av cs d vmb vbi vvn p-acp d n1, pn31 vvz av-j cst pns31 vbds np1 fw-la, dt ord p-acp n1 cc p-acp n1 pc-acp vvi np1 (c-acp pn31 vvd pno31 r-crq vhd crd n2 vvd pno31) cc-acp xx fw-la fw-la, dt j-jn p-acp n1, |