Romans 2.28 (Tyndale) - 1 |
romans 2.28: nether is that thynge circumcision which is outwarde in the flesshe. |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.767 |
0.906 |
2.284 |
Romans 2.28 (Geneva) - 1 |
romans 2.28: neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.738 |
0.926 |
0.645 |
Romans 4.10 (ODRV) - 2 |
romans 4.10: not in circumcision, but in prepuce. |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.722 |
0.518 |
0.685 |
Romans 2.26 (ODRV) - 1 |
romans 2.26: shal not his prepuce be reputed for circumcision? |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.64 |
0.342 |
0.61 |
Romans 2.28 (AKJV) |
romans 2.28: for hee is not a iew, which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.624 |
0.87 |
0.55 |
Romans 2.26 (AKJV) |
romans 2.26: therefore, if the vncircumcision keepe the righteousnesse of the law, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.619 |
0.407 |
0.5 |
Romans 2.26 (Geneva) |
romans 2.26: therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.617 |
0.468 |
0.5 |
Romans 2.26 (Tyndale) |
romans 2.26: therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.606 |
0.432 |
0.44 |
Romans 4.10 (Vulgate) |
romans 4.10: quomodo ergo reputata est? in circumcisione, an in praeputio? non in circumcisione, sed in praeputio. |
as if he should say, circumcision consisteth not in the outwarde paring away of the fleshe, |
False |
0.606 |
0.385 |
0.0 |