In-Text |
vnlesse there bee two diuerse, yea euen contrary wils in God, which vpon our doctrine they suppose most necessarily to follow. |
unless there be two diverse, yea even contrary wills in God, which upon our Doctrine they suppose most necessarily to follow. |
cs pc-acp vbi crd j, uh av j-jn n2 p-acp np1, r-crq p-acp po12 n1 pns32 vvi av-ds av-j pc-acp vvi. |
Note 0 |
Can you proue that God hath two wils? Is that which is not reuealed contrary to that which is reuealed? Then shal there bee contrariety in God, which is false. Was there euer any such monstrous doctrine? Idē Sect. 37. similia habet sect. 35. 36. & 45. |
Can you prove that God hath two wills? Is that which is not revealed contrary to that which is revealed? Then shall there be contrariety in God, which is false. Was there ever any such monstrous Doctrine? Idē Sect. 37. Similar habet sect. 35. 36. & 45. |
vmb pn22 vvi cst np1 vhz crd n2? vbz d r-crq vbz xx vvn j-jn p-acp cst r-crq vbz vvn? av vmb a-acp vbi n1 p-acp np1, r-crq vbz j. vbds a-acp av d d j n1? fw-la np1 crd fw-la fw-la n1. crd crd cc crd |