Doomes-Day: or, A treatise of the resurrection of the body Delivered in 22. sermons on 1. Cor. 15. Whereunto are added 7. other sermons, on 1. Cor. 16. By the late learned and iudicious divine, Martin Day ...
Day, Martin, d. 1629
Publisher: Printed by T homas H arper and M iles F lesher for Nathanael Butter and are to be sold at the signe of the Pide Bull neere Saint Austins gate
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1636
Approximate Era: CharlesI
TCP ID: A19987 ESTC ID: S109431 STC ID: 6427
Subject Headings:
Eschatology;
Sermons, English -- 17th century;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 5818 located on Image 146
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | and he will approve and make a defence for those things that are damnable: the Apostle doth insinuate the reason, Rom. 8.9. |
and he will approve and make a defence for those things that Are damnable: the Apostle does insinuate the reason, Rom. 8.9. where he Says, till the Law of God Come, he did not know concupiscence, except the Law had said, thou shalt not lust. | cc pns31 vmb vvi cc vvi dt n1 p-acp d n2 cst vbr j: dt n1 vdz vvi dt n1, np1 crd. c-crq pns31 vvz, c-acp dt n1 pp-f np1 vvd, pns31 vdd xx vvi n1, c-acp dt n1 vhd vvn, pns21 vm2 xx n1. |
| Note 0 | Rom. 8.9. | Rom. 8.9. | np1 crd. |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance: Romans 7.7 (Geneva); Romans 8.9
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romans 7.7 (Geneva) - 4 | romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. | where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | True | 0.85 | 0.926 | 2.451 |
| Romans 7.7 (AKJV) - 4 | romans 7.7: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. | where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | True | 0.841 | 0.938 | 5.699 |
| Romans 7.7 (Tyndale) - 4 | romans 7.7: for i had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. | where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | True | 0.841 | 0.88 | 2.284 |
| Romans 7.7 (ODRV) | romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. | where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | True | 0.8 | 0.905 | 7.642 |
| Romans 7.7 (AKJV) | romans 7.7: what shall wee say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. nay, i had not knowen sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. | and he will approve and make a defence for those things that are damnable: the apostle doth insinuate the reason, rom. 8.9. where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | False | 0.739 | 0.808 | 4.792 |
| Romans 7.7 (Geneva) | romans 7.7: what shall we say then? is the lawe sinne? god forbid. nay, i knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. | and he will approve and make a defence for those things that are damnable: the apostle doth insinuate the reason, rom. 8.9. where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | False | 0.729 | 0.744 | 2.18 |
| Romans 7.7 (ODRV) | romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. | and he will approve and make a defence for those things that are damnable: the apostle doth insinuate the reason, rom. 8.9. where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | False | 0.726 | 0.787 | 7.642 |
| Romans 7.7 (Tyndale) | romans 7.7: what shall we saye then? is the lawe synne? god forbid: but i knewe not what synne meant but by the lawe. for i had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. | and he will approve and make a defence for those things that are damnable: the apostle doth insinuate the reason, rom. 8.9. where hee saith, till the law of god came, he did not know concupiscence, except the law had said, thou shalt not lust | False | 0.681 | 0.567 | 2.068 |
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | Rom. 8.9. | Romans 8.9 | |
| Note 0 | Rom. 8.9. | Romans 8.9 |