In-Text |
And then secondly, he puts downe that conclusion, that they in likelyhood might, or, it may be, did inferre by way of interrogation likewise, Is the Law sinne? Shall wee thus conclude, doth this Conclusion follow on my former Position, that therefore the Law is sinne? To this he answers negatiuely, |
And then secondly, he puts down that conclusion, that they in likelihood might, or, it may be, did infer by Way of interrogation likewise, Is the Law sin? Shall we thus conclude, does this Conclusion follow on my former Position, that Therefore the Law is sin? To this he answers negatively, |
cc av ord, pns31 vvz a-acp d n1, cst pns32 p-acp n1 vmd, cc, pn31 vmb vbi, vdd vvi p-acp n1 pp-f n1 av, vbz dt n1 n1? vmb pns12 av vvi, vdz d n1 vvi p-acp po11 j n1, cst av dt n1 vbz n1? p-acp d pns31 vvz av-j, |