In-Text |
If they be thought meerly lawful, and such as may therefore be used upon weighty reasons at some times, but are found less edifying, who can doubt but I ought to use for my Soul (at least in an ordinary course) the aptest means that I can ordinarily have for the promoting its edification and salvation? Do we not reckon our selves to owe so much even to our bodies? And what is another mans opinion to signifie against my sense and constant experience? Is there not such a thing as a mental idiosynerasie (or peculiarity of temper) as well as a bodily? and whereto what is most agreeable, any man that is not destitute of ordinary understanding is the fittest judge himself. |
If they be Thought merely lawful, and such as may Therefore be used upon weighty Reasons At Some times, but Are found less edifying, who can doubt but I ought to use for my Soul (At least in an ordinary course) the aptest means that I can ordinarily have for the promoting its edification and salvation? Do we not reckon our selves to owe so much even to our bodies? And what is Another men opinion to signify against my sense and constant experience? Is there not such a thing as a mental idiosynerasie (or peculiarity of temper) as well as a bodily? and whereto what is most agreeable, any man that is not destitute of ordinary understanding is the Fittest judge himself. |
cs pns32 vbb vvn av-j j, cc d c-acp vmb av vbi vvn p-acp j n2 p-acp d n2, p-acp vbr vvn av-dc j-vvg, r-crq vmb vvi cc-acp pns11 vmd pc-acp vvi p-acp po11 n1 (p-acp ds p-acp dt j n1) dt js n2 cst pns11 vmb av-jn vhb p-acp dt j-vvg po31 n1 cc n1? vdb pns12 xx vvi po12 n2 pc-acp vvi av av-d av p-acp po12 n2? cc q-crq vbz j-jn ng1 n1 pc-acp vvi p-acp po11 n1 cc j n1? vbz pc-acp xx d dt n1 p-acp dt j j (cc n1 pp-f n1) c-acp av c-acp dt j? cc c-crq q-crq vbz av-ds j, d n1 cst vbz xx j pp-f j n1 vbz dt js n1 px31. |