In-Text |
But what Logician doth not see a great deale more foisted into the Conclusion, then was in the Premises? Whole Adam was to be mortaliz'd, therefore all and every part. What a non sequitur is here? That is true of the whole; |
But what Logician does not see a great deal more foisted into the Conclusion, then was in the Premises? whole Adam was to be mortalized, Therefore all and every part. What a non sequitur is Here? That is true of the Whole; |
cc-acp q-crq n1 vdz xx vvi dt j n1 av-dc vvn p-acp dt n1, av vbds p-acp dt n2? j-jn np1 vbds pc-acp vbi vvn, av d cc d n1. q-crq dt fw-fr fw-la vbz av? cst vbz j pp-f dt j-jn; |