In-Text |
Who doubts, but then the major part were subject to Rome, and so were Babylonish? But here is no reply to what had been distinguished of the Martyrs, of the holy remnant in those dayes, who would not be subject to Rome. But perceiving what a formal Disputant I had to deal with, I granted all (according to my former distinction) and let him run on to this ensuing Enthymema. |
Who doubts, but then the Major part were Subject to Room, and so were Babylonish? But Here is no reply to what had been distinguished of the Martyrs, of the holy remnant in those days, who would not be Subject to Room. But perceiving what a formal Disputant I had to deal with, I granted all (according to my former distinction) and let him run on to this ensuing Enthymeme. |
q-crq n2, cc-acp av dt j n1 vbdr j-jn p-acp vvi, cc av vbdr np1? p-acp av vbz dx n1 p-acp r-crq vhd vbn vvn pp-f dt n2, pp-f dt j n1 p-acp d n2, r-crq vmd xx vbi j-jn p-acp vvi. p-acp vvg r-crq dt j n1 pns11 vhd pc-acp vvi p-acp, pns11 vvd d (vvg p-acp po11 j n1) cc vvb pno31 vvi a-acp p-acp d j-vvg n1. |