In-Text |
so of Seth, so of Enos, so of Cainan, so of all the Antecessors of Enoch; wherefore unless Enoch had some other issue out of this world diverse from the rest (which was by translation without death) why should it be said of him so differently from all others, he was not, for the Lord took him? |
so of Seth, so of Enos, so of Cainan, so of all the Antecessors of Enoch; Wherefore unless Enoch had Some other issue out of this world diverse from the rest (which was by Translation without death) why should it be said of him so differently from all Others, he was not, for the Lord took him? |
av pp-f np1, av pp-f np1, av pp-f np1, av pp-f d dt n2 pp-f np1; c-crq cs np1 vhd d j-jn n1 av pp-f d n1 j p-acp dt n1 (r-crq vbds p-acp n1 p-acp n1) c-crq vmd pn31 vbi vvn pp-f pno31 av av-j p-acp d n2-jn, pns31 vbds xx, c-acp dt n1 vvd pno31? |