In-Text |
In this discourse, he both gives a further reason of his declining to pretend to sinlesness (and therefore it is connected with what precedes, by the particles, For, ) by shewing that as the matter stood, he could not, no• durst debate the matter with God, considering the inequality of the parties in themselves, v. 32. and that there was no superior Judge, to whom recourse might be had, v. 33. And yet he proves his sincerity, by offering to plead his cause on more equal terms, v. 34, 35 —. |
In this discourse, he both gives a further reason of his declining to pretend to sinlessness (and Therefore it is connected with what precedes, by the particles, For,) by showing that as the matter stood, he could not, no• durst debate the matter with God, considering the inequality of the parties in themselves, v. 32. and that there was no superior Judge, to whom recourse might be had, v. 33. And yet he Proves his sincerity, by offering to plead his cause on more equal terms, v. 34, 35 —. |
p-acp d n1, pns31 av-d vvz dt jc n1 pp-f po31 j-vvg pc-acp vvi p-acp n1 (cc av pn31 vbz vvn p-acp r-crq vvz, p-acp dt n2, p-acp,) p-acp vvg cst c-acp dt n1 vvd, pns31 vmd xx, n1 vvd vvi dt n1 p-acp np1, vvg dt n1 pp-f dt n2 p-acp px32, n1 crd cc d a-acp vbds dx j-jn n1, p-acp ro-crq n1 vmd vbi vhn, n1 crd cc av pns31 vvz po31 n1, p-acp vvg pc-acp vvi po31 n1 p-acp av-dc j-jn n2, n1 crd, crd —. |