In-Text |
or because guilty? this would be a plain contradiction, oppositum in apposito. 'Tis with Law-contraries as 'tis with Physicalcontraries, upon the position of the one there needs must be the exclusion or negation of the other; |
or Because guilty? this would be a plain contradiction, oppositum in apposito. It's with Law-contraries as it's with Physicalcontraries, upon the position of the one there needs must be the exclusion or negation of the other; |
cc c-acp j? d vmd vbi dt j n1, fw-la p-acp fw-la. pn31|vbz p-acp j c-acp pn31|vbz p-acp n2-jn, p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt crd a-acp av vmb vbi dt n1 cc n1 pp-f dt j-jn; |