In-Text |
1. This Sending of Christ strongly imply's his Praeecistence before his Incarnation. For if he had not had a Being before, how could the Father send him? that which is not cannot be sent. 'Tis not said here that God now created him or made him (as if he did not exist before ), |
1. This Sending of christ strongly imply's his Preexistence before his Incarnation. For if he had not had a Being before, how could the Father send him? that which is not cannot be sent. It's not said Here that God now created him or made him (as if he did not exist before), |
crd d vvg pp-f np1 av-j ng1 po31 n1 p-acp po31 n1. c-acp cs pns31 vhd xx vhn dt vbg a-acp, c-crq vmd dt n1 vvi pno31? d r-crq vbz xx vmbx vbi vvn. pn31|vbz xx vvn av cst np1 av vvn pno31 cc vvn pno31 (c-acp cs pns31 vdd xx vvi p-acp), |
Note 1 |
Non de novo creans vel faciens, sed quasi praeexistentem misit. Aquin. Misit, non creavit aut condidit, sed qui secum erat ceaeternus, eundem ad nos 〈 ◊ 〉 •egavit; non ut e••et ubi non fuer at &c. Sed up appareret ubi in visibili modo erat. Soro. The whole body of the Socinian Authors agree in this, except Erasmus Johannis who fell in with the Arrian•. See Socinus his Disp. with him. De Filii Dei existe•••. |
Non de novo Cleanse vel Faciens, sed quasi praeexistentem misit. Aquinas Misit, non Created Or condidit, sed qui secum erat ceaeternus, eundem ad nos 〈 ◊ 〉 •egavit; non ut e••et ubi non fuer At etc. Said up appareret ubi in visibili modo erat. Soro. The Whole body of the Socinian Authors agree in this, except Erasmus joannis who fell in with the Arrian•. See Socinus his Disp with him. De Sons Dei existe•••. |
fw-fr fw-fr fw-la n2 fw-la n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la 〈 sy 〉 fw-la; fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-fr av p-acp av j-vvn a-acp fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1. dt j-jn n1 pp-f dt np1 n2 vvb p-acp d, c-acp np1 np1 r-crq vvd p-acp p-acp dt np1. vvb np1 po31 np1 p-acp pno31. fw-fr fw-la fw-la n1. |