Philippians 2.6 (AKJV) |
philippians 2.6: who being in the forme of god, thought it not robbery to bee equall with god: |
as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
True |
0.721 |
0.683 |
2.843 |
Philippians 2.6 (ODRV) |
philippians 2.6: who when he was in the forme of god, thought it no robberie, himself to be equal to god: |
as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
True |
0.711 |
0.462 |
3.778 |
Philippians 2.6 (Geneva) |
philippians 2.6: who being in ye forme of god, thought it no robberie to be equall with god: |
as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
True |
0.703 |
0.471 |
1.269 |
Philippians 2.6 (Tyndale) |
philippians 2.6: which beynge in the shape of god and thought it not robbery to be equall with god. |
as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
True |
0.701 |
0.613 |
2.843 |
Philippians 2.6 (AKJV) |
philippians 2.6: who being in the forme of god, thought it not robbery to bee equall with god: |
this is one answer for the clearing up of the difficulty and the weakening of the objection which we have to do with. 2. the learned further distinguish of a twofold inferiority, one in respect of nature, and one in respect of office, condition, or dispensation. as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
False |
0.611 |
0.774 |
3.944 |
Philippians 2.6 (Geneva) |
philippians 2.6: who being in ye forme of god, thought it no robberie to be equall with god: |
this is one answer for the clearing up of the difficulty and the weakening of the objection which we have to do with. 2. the learned further distinguish of a twofold inferiority, one in respect of nature, and one in respect of office, condition, or dispensation. as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
False |
0.607 |
0.654 |
2.069 |
Philippians 2.6 (ODRV) |
philippians 2.6: who when he was in the forme of god, thought it no robberie, himself to be equal to god: |
this is one answer for the clearing up of the difficulty and the weakening of the objection which we have to do with. 2. the learned further distinguish of a twofold inferiority, one in respect of nature, and one in respect of office, condition, or dispensation. as to the first, christ neither was nor is in the least inferiour to the father (both having the same nature and essence, in respect of which he thought it not robbery to be [ equal ] with god ) |
False |
0.606 |
0.649 |
4.553 |