In-Text |
Now who could be so fit to bring God and Man together, as he who was himself both God and Man? who so fit to negotiate with both, as he who was a middle Person betwixt both? who so fit to treat with an offended God, as he who was God? who so fit to suffer as he who was Man, and to merit by suffering as he who was God-man? Had he been only God he could not have suffered, had he been only Man he could not have merited: but being both he was eminently fit for both, (viz.) for suffering and meriting, for obeying and satisfying. Thus his not to be parallell'd Fitness was grounded upon his Personal consideration. |
Now who could be so fit to bring God and Man together, as he who was himself both God and Man? who so fit to negotiate with both, as he who was a middle Person betwixt both? who so fit to Treat with an offended God, as he who was God? who so fit to suffer as he who was Man, and to merit by suffering as he who was God-man? Had he been only God he could not have suffered, had he been only Man he could not have merited: but being both he was eminently fit for both, (viz.) for suffering and meriting, for obeying and satisfying. Thus his not to be paralleled Fitness was grounded upon his Personal consideration. |
av q-crq vmd vbi av j p-acp vvb np1 cc n1 av, c-acp pns31 r-crq vbds px31 av-d np1 cc n1? r-crq av j p-acp vvi p-acp d, c-acp pns31 r-crq vbds dt j-jn n1 p-acp d? r-crq av j p-acp vvb p-acp dt vvn np1, c-acp pns31 r-crq vbds np1? r-crq av j p-acp vvb c-acp pns31 r-crq vbds n1, cc p-acp vvb p-acp vvg c-acp pns31 r-crq vbds n1? vhd pns31 vbn av-j np1 pns31 vmd xx vhi vvn, vhd pns31 vbn av-j n1 pns31 vmd xx vhi vvn: p-acp vbg d pns31 vbds av-j j p-acp av-d, (n1) p-acp vvg cc vvg, p-acp vvg cc vvg. av po31 xx pc-acp vbi vvn n1 vbds vvn p-acp po31 j n1. |