In-Text |
So that it points to two things, to his being eternally begotten, to his being begotten in the Divine Essence. As to the latter, I chuse to express it so because 'tis more safe (if not more true ) to say that the Son was begotten in that Essence, rather than out of it. And Some (who endeavour to open these profound Mysteries ) tell us, that here we are not to consider Christ essentially as he is God, but Personally as the Divine Essence subsists in him as the Second Person: |
So that it points to two things, to his being eternally begotten, to his being begotten in the Divine Essence. As to the latter, I choose to express it so Because it's more safe (if not more true) to say that the Son was begotten in that Essence, rather than out of it. And some (who endeavour to open these profound Mysteres) tell us, that Here we Are not to Consider christ essentially as he is God, but Personally as the Divine Essence subsists in him as the Second Person: |
av cst pn31 vvz p-acp crd n2, p-acp po31 vbg av-j vvn, p-acp po31 vbg vvn p-acp dt j-jn n1. c-acp p-acp dt d, pns11 vvb pc-acp vvi pn31 av c-acp pn31|vbz n1 j (cs xx av-dc j) pc-acp vvi cst dt n1 vbds vvn p-acp d n1, av-c cs av pp-f pn31. cc d (r-crq n1 pc-acp vvi d j n2) vvb pno12, cst av pns12 vbr xx pc-acp vvi np1 av-j c-acp pns31 vbz np1, p-acp av-j p-acp dt j-jn n1 vvz p-acp pno31 p-acp dt ord n1: |