In-Text |
If the Father was eternal and always a Father then the Son was eternal and alwayes a Son, for Relatives must be simultaneous. This was that which greatly troubled and vexed Arius so often to hear the Orthodox speaking of, semper Pater semper Filius, simul Pater simul Filius, (I say) this offended him very much, (as appears by what he himself wrote in his Letter to Eusebius ): |
If the Father was Eternal and always a Father then the Son was Eternal and always a Son, for Relatives must be simultaneous. This was that which greatly troubled and vexed Arius so often to hear the Orthodox speaking of, semper Pater semper Filius, simul Pater simul Filius, (I say) this offended him very much, (as appears by what he himself wrote in his letter to Eusebius): |
cs dt n1 vbds j cc av dt n1 av dt n1 vbds j cc av dt n1, p-acp n2 vmb vbi j. d vbds d r-crq av-j vvn cc j-vvn np1 av av pc-acp vvi dt n1 vvg pp-f, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, (pns11 vvb) d vvn pno31 av av-d, (c-acp vvz p-acp r-crq pns31 px31 vvd p-acp po31 n1 p-acp np1): |