In-Text |
(2.) That the Second Person only was incarnate. (3.) That this was not done till the fulness of time. (4.) That 'twas not the divine Essence absolutely considered which assumed Flesh, but that Essence considered as subsisting in the Second Person. (5.) That the Nature assuming was the Divine Nature. (6.) That the Humane Nature was so assum'd as to subsist in the Divine, and that both of these Natures make but one Person: ( where the Hypostatical Union is opened and prov'd). (7.) 'Tis probable that if Adam had not fallen Christ had not been sent in the Flesh. |
(2.) That the Second Person only was incarnate. (3.) That this was not done till the fullness of time. (4.) That 'twas not the divine Essence absolutely considered which assumed Flesh, but that Essence considered as subsisting in the Second Person. (5.) That the Nature assuming was the Divine Nature. (6.) That the Humane Nature was so assumed as to subsist in the Divine, and that both of these Nature's make but one Person: (where the Hypostatical union is opened and proved). (7.) It's probable that if Adam had not fallen christ had not been sent in the Flesh. |
(crd) cst dt ord n1 av-j vbds j. (crd) cst d vbds xx vdn p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1. (crd) cst pn31|vbds xx dt j-jn n1 av-j vvn r-crq vvn n1, p-acp d n1 vvn p-acp vvg p-acp dt ord n1. (crd) cst dt n1 vvg vbds dt j-jn n1. (crd) cst dt j n1 vbds av vvn a-acp p-acp vvi p-acp dt j-jn, cc d d pp-f d n2 vvb p-acp crd n1: (q-crq dt j n1 vbz vvn cc vvn). (crd) pn31|vbz j cst cs np1 vhd xx vvn np1 vhd xx vbn vvn p-acp dt n1. |