In-Text |
He was the Lord of David and the Son of David, the branch of David and the root of David, both root and off-spring; how could such different things be affirm'd of him but upon the distinction of his two Natures? that therefore is not in the least impeach'd by the Hypostatical Ʋnion. True, upon this Union there is the communication of properties betwixt them, |
He was the Lord of David and the Son of David, the branch of David and the root of David, both root and offspring; how could such different things be affirmed of him but upon the distinction of his two Nature's? that Therefore is not in the least impeached by the Hypostatical Ʋnion. True, upon this union there is the communication of properties betwixt them, |
pns31 vbds dt n1 pp-f np1 cc dt n1 pp-f np1, dt n1 pp-f np1 cc dt n1 pp-f np1, d n1 cc n1; c-crq vmd d j n2 vbb vvn pp-f pno31 p-acp p-acp dt n1 pp-f po31 crd n2? cst av vbz xx p-acp dt av-ds vvn p-acp dt j n1. j, p-acp d n1 a-acp vbz dt n1 pp-f n2 p-acp pno32, |