In-Text |
And 'tis probable that the Apostle in these descriptions in special-had his eye upon Simon Magus, who deny'd that Christ came in true flesh. The Argument then (so far as 'tis grounded upon these Texts ) only proves, that his HOLINESS is none of the little Antichrists (of whom John spake as already come), which we readily grant, |
And it's probable that the Apostle in these descriptions in special-had his eye upon Simon Magus, who denied that christ Come in true Flesh. The Argument then (so Far as it's grounded upon these Texts) only Proves, that his HOLINESS is none of the little Antichrists (of whom John spoke as already come), which we readily grant, |
cc pn31|vbz j cst dt n1 p-acp d n2 p-acp j po31 n1 p-acp np1 np1, r-crq vvn d np1 vvd p-acp j n1. dt n1 av (av av-j c-acp pn31|vbz vvn p-acp d n2) av-j vvz, cst po31 n1 vbz pix pp-f dt j np2 (pp-f ro-crq np1 vvd a-acp av vvn), r-crq pns12 av-j vvb, |