In-Text |
no imputation lower than this will serve our turn nor suit with the Scripture-notion of the Word. 6. They (who dissent) bring in the imputation of Christ's active Obedience as a part of his Satisfaction; whence I argue, he satisfied in our stead, as he obeyed he satisfied, therefore he obeyed in our stead. Christ's active Obedience being satisfactory as well as his passive, why should not that eo nomine come under the same imputation which the passive doth? 7. If this be all in the imputation of Christ's Obedience that 'tis reckoned to the Sinner for his good, then we are all agreed, all Controversies are at an end: for who, |
no imputation lower than this will serve our turn nor suit with the Scripture notion of the Word. 6. They (who dissent) bring in the imputation of Christ's active obedience as a part of his Satisfaction; whence I argue, he satisfied in our stead, as he obeyed he satisfied, Therefore he obeyed in our stead. Christ's active obedience being satisfactory as well as his passive, why should not that eo nomine come under the same imputation which the passive does? 7. If this be all in the imputation of Christ's obedience that it's reckoned to the Sinner for his good, then we Are all agreed, all Controversies Are At an end: for who, |
dx n1 jc cs d n1 vvi po12 n1 ccx n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1. crd pns32 (r-crq n1) vvb p-acp dt n1 pp-f npg1 j n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f po31 n1; c-crq pns11 vvb, pns31 vvn p-acp po12 n1, c-acp pns31 vvn pns31 vvn, av pns31 vvn p-acp po12 n1. npg1 j n1 vbg j c-acp av c-acp po31 j, q-crq vmd xx d fw-la fw-la vvb p-acp dt d n1 r-crq dt j vdz? crd cs d vbb d p-acp dt n1 pp-f npg1 n1 cst pn31|vbz vvn p-acp dt n1 p-acp po31 j, av pns12 vbr d vvn, d n2 vbr p-acp dt n1: p-acp r-crq, |