In-Text |
And 1. what if the Opinion (argued against) doth make remission of sin and imputed righteousness to be different parts of Justification (they both as integral parts concurring to the compleating and perfecting of it)? I say, what if it so doth? is it the worse for that, is this a novel tenent or that which but few or none do own? have not several with great solidity and judgment defended it? as to any error in it or any absurdities that will follow upon it, I must confess I do not (as yet) understand either the one or the other. |
And 1. what if the Opinion (argued against) does make remission of since and imputed righteousness to be different parts of Justification (they both as integral parts concurring to the completing and perfecting of it)? I say, what if it so does? is it the Worse for that, is this a novel tenent or that which but few or none do own? have not several with great solidity and judgement defended it? as to any error in it or any absurdities that will follow upon it, I must confess I do not (as yet) understand either the one or the other. |
cc crd q-crq cs dt n1 (vvn p-acp) vdz vvi n1 pp-f n1 cc j-vvn n1 pc-acp vbi j n2 pp-f n1 (pns32 d p-acp j n2 vvg p-acp dt vvg cc vvg pp-f pn31)? pns11 vvb, r-crq cs pn31 av vdz? vbz pn31 dt av-jc p-acp d, vbz d dt j j cc cst r-crq p-acp d cc pix vdb vvi? vhb xx j p-acp j n1 cc n1 vvd pn31? p-acp p-acp d n1 p-acp pn31 cc d n2 cst vmb vvi p-acp pn31, pns11 vmb vvi pns11 vdb xx (c-acp av) vvb d dt crd cc dt n-jn. |