In-Text |
'Tis true, the Apostle Rom. 4.6, 7, 8. speaking of the Sinners righteousness instances only in the forgiveness or non-imputation of sin; but he doth not do it as if that was the all in that righteousness, but (1.) because that being one eminent part thereof he puts it for the whole: (2.) because that remission of sin and the imputation of a positive righteousness being never parted, in naming the one he included the other: not as if they were one and the same in their nature but because they are never separated in the •ubject. I cannot yet be convinc'd but that the removal of Sins guilt and the introducing of a positive righteousness, are things of a different nature and carry distinct notions in them: |
It's true, the Apostle Rom. 4.6, 7, 8. speaking of the Sinners righteousness instances only in the forgiveness or non-imputation of since; but he does not do it as if that was the all in that righteousness, but (1.) Because that being one eminent part thereof he puts it for the Whole: (2.) Because that remission of since and the imputation of a positive righteousness being never parted, in naming the one he included the other: not as if they were one and the same in their nature but Because they Are never separated in the •ubject. I cannot yet be convinced but that the removal of Sins guilt and the introducing of a positive righteousness, Are things of a different nature and carry distinct notions in them: |
pn31|vbz j, dt n1 np1 crd, crd, crd vvg pp-f dt n2 n1 n2 av-j p-acp dt n1 cc n1 pp-f n1; p-acp pns31 vdz xx vdi pn31 c-acp cs cst vbds dt d p-acp cst n1, p-acp (crd) c-acp cst vbg crd j n1 av pns31 vvz pn31 p-acp dt j-jn: (crd) c-acp d n1 pp-f n1 cc dt n1 pp-f dt j n1 vbg av vvd, p-acp vvg dt crd pns31 vvd dt j-jn: xx c-acp cs pns32 vbdr crd cc dt d p-acp po32 n1 p-acp c-acp pns32 vbr av vvn p-acp dt j-jn. pns11 vmbx av vbi vvd p-acp d dt n1 pp-f n2 n1 cc dt vvg pp-f dt j n1, vbr n2 pp-f dt j n1 cc vvi j n2 p-acp pno32: |