In-Text |
and at length by the Apostles, distinguished into two, though after the writing of their Epistles, will rationally presume that the distinction of names took its date from the distinction of the things, which Salmasius himself has owned against Petavius; and that the ceasing to use the words promiscuously, can never take off from our Author the credit of an Apostolical writer, notwithstanding the pretended inconformity thereof to the writings of the Apostles themselves. |
and At length by the Apostles, distinguished into two, though After the writing of their Epistles, will rationally presume that the distinction of names took its date from the distinction of the things, which salmasius himself has owned against Petavius; and that the ceasing to use the words promiscuously, can never take off from our Author the credit of an Apostolical writer, notwithstanding the pretended inconformity thereof to the writings of the Apostles themselves. |
cc p-acp n1 p-acp dt n2, vvn p-acp crd, cs p-acp dt n-vvg pp-f po32 n2, vmb av-j vvi cst dt n1 pp-f n2 vvd po31 n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n2, r-crq np1 px31 vhz vvd p-acp np1; cc d dt vvg pc-acp vvi dt n2 av-j, vmb av-x vvi a-acp p-acp po12 n1 dt n1 pp-f dt j n1, c-acp dt j-vvn n1 av p-acp dt n2 pp-f dt n2 px32. |