In-Text |
because they were not, Math. 2.18. and in some respects (as we shall shew before we have done) Jacobs example is more considerable then Rachels, and withall more pertinent to our purpose, which that you may the more perspiculously perceive, some precedent passages of this verse must be observed, which may come in with good due coherence to the Text thus. |
Because they were not, Math. 2.18. and in Some respects (as we shall show before we have done) Jacobs Exampl is more considerable then Rachels, and withal more pertinent to our purpose, which that you may the more perspiculously perceive, Some precedent passages of this verse must be observed, which may come in with good due coherence to the Text thus. |
c-acp pns32 vbdr xx, np1 crd. cc p-acp d n2 (c-acp pns12 vmb vvi c-acp pns12 vhb vdn) np1 n1 vbz av-dc j cs npg1, cc av av-dc j p-acp po12 n1, r-crq d pn22 vmb dt av-dc av-j vvi, d j n2 pp-f d n1 vmb vbi vvn, r-crq vmb vvi p-acp p-acp j j-jn n1 p-acp dt n1 av. |