| Note 0 |
1562. Jul. 24. Padre Pa•l• ▪ saith Atai•e ▪ Cardinal Palavicino saith F•rer• shewed, that the Sacrifice of the Mass cannot be pr•ved from Scripture alone, without Tradition: particularly, that it cannot be pr•ved from Christ, words at the last Supper ▪ but by the uniform exposition of the Fathers. He adds, that They did not so understand it, as if their sense were of Faith. The truth is, the Ancient Fathers did not so understand our Saviours words, nor perhaps did many of the Trent Fathers themselves. For when the question was put, whether Christ at the last Supper offered himself for a Propitiatory Sacrifice; it held both the Divines and Bishops in long Dispute, saith Card. Pallavicino. XVII. 13. 11, &c. It was alledged on the one hand, that if that at the last Supper was a true Propitiatory Sacrifice, then that upon the Cross could be only in remembrance of this: and on the other hand, if it was not such a Sacrifice, then there was no such Sacrifice Instituted by Christ; for the words of Institution, Hoc Facite, could refer to nothing else but to what was done then and there. (I have shewed that they refer to those words, Take, Eat, Drink; and were spoken to the Disciples, as Communicants, and no otherwise.) After much time and heat, at last the Doctrine was set down in these words, that at the last Supper Christ offered himself for a Sacrifice, without saying whether Propitiatory, or Eucharistical. But neither did this satisfie, saith Cardinal Pallavicino, XVIII. 9. 3. |
1562. Jul. 24. Padre Pa•l• ▪ Says Atai•e ▪ Cardinal Palavicino Says F•rer• showed, that the Sacrifice of the Mass cannot be pr•ved from Scripture alone, without Tradition: particularly, that it cannot be pr•ved from christ, words At the last Supper ▪ but by the uniform exposition of the Father's. He adds, that They did not so understand it, as if their sense were of Faith. The truth is, the Ancient Father's did not so understand our Saviors words, nor perhaps did many of the Trent Father's themselves. For when the question was put, whither christ At the last Supper offered himself for a Propitiatory Sacrifice; it held both the Divines and Bishops in long Dispute, Says Card. Pallavicino. XVII. 13. 11, etc. It was alleged on the one hand, that if that At the last Supper was a true Propitiatory Sacrifice, then that upon the Cross could be only in remembrance of this: and on the other hand, if it was not such a Sacrifice, then there was no such Sacrifice Instituted by christ; for the words of Institution, Hoc Facite, could refer to nothing Else but to what was done then and there. (I have showed that they refer to those words, Take, Eat, Drink; and were spoken to the Disciples, as Communicants, and no otherwise.) After much time and heat, At last the Doctrine was Set down in these words, that At the last Supper christ offered himself for a Sacrifice, without saying whither Propitiatory, or Eucharistical. But neither did this satisfy, Says Cardinal Pallavicino, XVIII. 9. 3. |
crd np1 crd np1 np1 ▪ vvz vbr ▪ j np1 vvz np1 vvd, cst dt n1 pp-f dt n1 vmbx vbi vvn p-acp n1 av-j, p-acp n1: av-j, cst pn31 vmbx vbi vvn p-acp np1, n2 p-acp dt ord n1 ▪ cc-acp p-acp dt j n1 pp-f dt n2. pns31 vvz, cst pns32 vdd xx av vvi pn31, c-acp cs po32 n1 vbdr pp-f n1. dt n1 vbz, dt j n2 vdd xx av vvi po12 ng1 n2, ccx av vdd d pp-f dt np1 ng1 px32. p-acp c-crq dt n1 vbds vvn, cs np1 p-acp dt ord n1 vvd px31 p-acp dt j n1; pn31 vvd d dt n2-jn cc n2 p-acp j vvb, vvz np1 np1. crd. crd crd, av pn31 vbds vvn p-acp dt crd n1, cst cs cst p-acp dt ord n1 vbds dt j j n1, av cst p-acp dt n1 vmd vbi j p-acp n1 pp-f d: cc p-acp dt j-jn n1, cs pn31 vbds xx d dt n1, av a-acp vbds dx d n1 vvn p-acp np1; p-acp dt n2 pp-f n1, fw-la n1, vmd vvi p-acp pix av cc-acp p-acp q-crq vbds vdn av cc a-acp. (pns11 vhb vvn cst pns32 vvb p-acp d n2, vvb, vvb, vvb; cc vbdr vvn p-acp dt n2, c-acp n2, cc dx av.) p-acp d n1 cc n1, p-acp ord dt n1 vbds vvn a-acp p-acp d n2, cst p-acp dt ord n1 np1 vvd px31 p-acp dt n1, p-acp vvg cs j, cc j. p-acp d vdd d vvi, vvz n1 np1, crd. crd crd |
