| In-Text |
and teares of the Incendiaries, and feeders of it? How many are there who daily urge text for Bloud-shed, and undertake to prove the slaughter of their Brethren; (I had almost said of their lawfull Prince and Soveraigne too) warrantable by the VVord of God? What bold Libell, or Pamphlet hath not for some yeares railed in a holy style? And what Sermons have not been spiced with a a holy sedition? Hath it not (even to the ruine of one of the most flourishing Kingdomes of the world) beene made a piece of Religion to divide it against it self, & to divorce a King from his People, and his people from their peace? Have not men been taught that they cannot give God his due, if they give Caesar his? And that the onely way left to preserve in themselves, the grace and favour of the one, is quite to deface and blot out the image and superscription of the other? And have not the Teachers of these strange, unchristian Doctrines, delivered them to the people in the holy stile of Prophets? Have they not called a most unnaturall, civill VVar, the burden of the Lord? Have they not quite inverted the injunction of the Apostle ▪ and turning his affirmative into their negative, have they not (directly contrary to his word) said, Thus saith the Lord, honour not the King? |
and tears of the Incendiaries, and feeders of it? How many Are there who daily urge text for Bloodshed, and undertake to prove the slaughter of their Brothers; (I had almost said of their lawful Prince and Sovereign too) warrantable by the Word of God? What bold Libel, or Pamphlet hath not for Some Years railed in a holy style? And what Sermons have not been spiced with a a holy sedition? Hath it not (even to the ruin of one of the most flourishing Kingdoms of the world) been made a piece of Religion to divide it against it self, & to divorce a King from his People, and his people from their peace? Have not men been taught that they cannot give God his due, if they give Caesar his? And that the only Way left to preserve in themselves, the grace and favour of the one, is quite to deface and blot out the image and superscription of the other? And have not the Teachers of these strange, unchristian Doctrines, Delivered them to the people in the holy style of prophets? Have they not called a most unnatural, civil VVar, the burden of the Lord? Have they not quite inverted the injunction of the Apostle ▪ and turning his affirmative into their negative, have they not (directly contrary to his word) said, Thus Says the Lord, honour not the King? |
cc n2 pp-f dt n2-j, cc n2 pp-f pn31? q-crq d vbr a-acp r-crq j vvb n1 p-acp j, cc vvb pc-acp vvi dt n1 pp-f po32 n2; (pns11 vhd av vvn pp-f po32 j n1 cc n-jn av) j p-acp dt n1 pp-f np1? q-crq j vvi, cc n1 vhz xx p-acp d ng2 vvd p-acp dt j n1? cc r-crq n2 vhb xx vbn vvn p-acp dt dt j n1? vhz pn31 xx (av p-acp dt n1 pp-f crd pp-f dt av-ds j-vvg ng1 pp-f dt n1) vbn vvn dt n1 pp-f n1 p-acp vvb pn31 p-acp pn31 n1, cc pc-acp vvi dt n1 p-acp po31 n1, cc po31 n1 p-acp po32 n1? vhb xx n2 vbi vvn cst pns32 vmbx vvi np1 po31 j-jn, cs pns32 vvb np1 png31? cc cst dt j n1 vvd pc-acp vvi p-acp px32, dt vvb cc vvb pp-f dt crd, vbz av pc-acp vvi cc vvi av dt n1 cc n1 pp-f dt j-jn? cc vhb xx dt n2 pp-f d j, j n2, vvd pno32 p-acp dt n1 p-acp dt j n1 pp-f n2? vhb pns32 xx vvn dt av-ds j, j n1, dt n1 pp-f dt n1? vhb pns32 xx av vvn dt n1 pp-f dt n1 ▪ cc vvg po31 j p-acp po32 j-jn, vhb pns32 xx (av-j j-jn p-acp po31 n1) vvd, av vvz dt n1, vvb xx dt n1? |
