In-Text |
Will Mr. Cressy so confound an Adjective in Bilis, with a Participle derived from the passive preterperfest Tense, as either to argue à non actu ad non potentiam, or else to pass over from the one unto the other? Will he argue that Adam before his fall was Impeccable, because he yet was preserved from actual sin? or, that the Church was Infallible in the Apostles own Times, because she was not erroneous until she was? He cannot sure be so destitute either of Logick or Grammer skill. |
Will Mr. Cressy so confound an Adjective in Bilis, with a Participle derived from the passive preterperfest Tense, as either to argue à non Acts ad non potentiam, or Else to pass over from the one unto the other? Will he argue that Adam before his fallen was Impeccable, Because he yet was preserved from actual since? or, that the Church was Infallible in the Apostles own Times, Because she was not erroneous until she was? He cannot sure be so destitute either of Logic or Grammar skill. |
n1 n1 np1 av vvi dt n1 p-acp np1, p-acp dt n1 vvn p-acp dt j j n1, a-acp av-d pc-acp vvi fw-fr fw-fr fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, cc av pc-acp vvi a-acp p-acp dt crd p-acp dt j-jn? vmb pns31 vvi d np1 p-acp po31 n1 vbds j, c-acp pns31 av vbds vvn p-acp j n1? cc, cst dt n1 vbds j p-acp dt n2 d n2, c-acp pns31 vbds xx j c-acp pns31 vbds? pns31 vmbx av-j vbi av j av-d pp-f n1 cc n1 n1. |