In-Text |
The School-men have perplexed and entangled themselves and this Doctrine with Endless Difficulties, and run it into such Contradictions as themselves own would be so in any thing else , (as for the same thing to be one and three, the same and not the same, produced and not produced) and have obscured it with dark and unintelligible (not to say false) terms, which only amuse but do not satisfie, |
The Schoolmen have perplexed and entangled themselves and this Doctrine with Endless Difficulties, and run it into such Contradictions as themselves own would be so in any thing Else, (as for the same thing to be one and three, the same and not the same, produced and not produced) and have obscured it with dark and unintelligible (not to say false) terms, which only amuse but do not satisfy, |
dt n2 vhb vvn cc vvn px32 cc d n1 p-acp j n2, cc vvb pn31 p-acp d n2 p-acp px32 vvi vmd vbi av p-acp d n1 av, (c-acp p-acp dt d n1 pc-acp vbi crd cc crd, dt d cc xx dt d, vvn cc xx vvn) cc vhb vvn pn31 p-acp j cc j (xx pc-acp vvi j) n2, r-crq av-j vvi cc-acp vdb xx vvi, |
Note 0 |
Tenet praeterquam in proposito in divinis, eo quod nusquam alibi possunt esse tres res quarum nulla est alia quae tamen sunt una res numero, sed tantum in divinis illa reperitur. Biel Repertor L. 1. Dist. 5. Qu. 1. Impossibile putant unam rem singularim esse plures res ficut impossibile est in creaturis, — & quidem in Creaturis non datur instantia, sed in divinis datur. Ibid. Distinctionem virtualem in eo formalissimè consistere, quòd uni realiter indivisibili à parte rei & independenter a nostris conceptibus conveniant praedicata quae alioquin videtur contradictoria, & quidem in creaturis essent contradictoria, — in divinis posse eandem rem produci & non produci communicari & non communicari quod nulli Creaturae convenit, — in divinis capacitatem majorem in una indivisibili re ad habenda praedicata contradictoria quam in humanis, — quod si rationem a priori hujus distinctionis quaeramus, non aliam possumus reddere nisi infinitam perfectionem Dei, ratione cujus in ordine ad aliqua praedicata in se opposita habet capacitatem ea recipiendi simul, perinde ac si esset multiplex realiter, — fateor eam aequivalentiam difficulter intelligi, non est tamen propterea neganda, eam enim fides, in cujus obsequium debemus captivare intellectum, manifeste ostendit. Arrlaga Tractat. de Mysterio Trinit. Disp. 42. Sect. 1. Eidem indivisibili rei respectu alterius etiam indivisibilis convenit realiter distingui & realiter esse idem. Ibid. Qui non attingunt non aliud non esse idem, & non idem non esse aliud non possunt capere &c. Cusan. in Crib. Alcor. L. 2. C. 8. |
Tenet Except in Purpose in divinis, eo quod nusquam alibi possunt esse tres Rest Whom nulla est Alias Quae tamen sunt una Rest numero, sed Tantum in divinis illa reperitur. Biel Repertor L. 1. Dist 5. Qu. 1. Impossibile Putant unam remembering singularim esse plures Rest ficut impossibile est in Creaturis, — & quidem in Creaturis non datur Instantia, sed in divinis datur. Ibid Distinctionem virtualem in eo formalissimè consistere, quòd uni realiter indivisibili à parte rei & independenter a nostris conceptibus conveniant praedicata Quae Alioquin videtur contradictoria, & quidem in Creaturis essent contradictoria, — in divinis posse eandem remembering produci & non produci Communication & non Communication quod None Creaturae convenit, — in divinis capacitatem majorem in una indivisibili re ad Habenda praedicata contradictoria quam in humanis, — quod si rationem a priori hujus distinctionis quaeramus, non aliam possumus reddere nisi infinitam perfectionem Dei, ratione cujus in Order ad Any praedicata in se Opposita habet capacitatem ea recipiendi simul, Perinde ac si esset multiplex realiter, — Fateor eam aequivalentiam Difficult intelligi, non est tamen propterea neganda, eam enim fides, in cujus obsequium debemus captivare Intellectum, manifest ostendit. Arrlaga Tractate de Mysterio Trinity. Disp 42. Sect. 1. Eidem indivisibili rei respectu alterius etiam indivisibilis convenit realiter distingui & realiter esse idem. Ibid Qui non attingunt non Aliud non esse idem, & non idem non esse Aliud non possunt capere etc. Cusan. in Crib. Alcor. L. 2. C. 8. |
n1 fw-la p-acp fw-la p-acp fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-it, fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 np1 np1 crd np1 crd n1 crd fw-la n1 fw-la vvg vvi fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la, — cc fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la. np1 fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-fr fw-la fw-la cc jc zz fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la, cc j-jn p-acp fw-la n-jn fw-la, — fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la vvg fw-la cc fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la fw-la fw-la av-j fw-la fw-la, — fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-mi fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la, — fw-la fw-la fw-la dt fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la p-acp n1 fw-la fw-la n1 p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, vvi fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, — n1 fw-la fw-la jc fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, j fw-la. np1 np1 fw-fr np1 fw-la. np1 crd np1 crd np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 fw-fr fw-fr fw-la fw-la vvn fw-la fw-la fw-la, cc fw-la fw-la fw-fr fw-la vvn fw-la fw-la fw-la av njp. p-acp n1. np1. np1 crd np1 crd |