A letter from Dr. P. to the Bishop of R--- in vindication of his sermon on Trinity Sunday.

Payne, William, 1650-1696
Publisher: Printed for Richard Cumberland
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1696
Approximate Era: WilliamAndMary
TCP ID: A56744 ESTC ID: R33033 STC ID: P905
Subject Headings: Church of England -- Controversial literature; Sermons, English -- 17th century; Sprat, Thomas, 1635-1713; Theology, Doctrinal;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 63 located on Page 25

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text but only in latter School-men and modern Metaphysicks , that they have thereby given too much advantage to the Socinians, who have been prejudiced and hardned by these Scholastick Explications against the Doctrine it self, but only in latter Schoolmen and modern Metaphysics, that they have thereby given too much advantage to the socinians, who have been prejudiced and hardened by these Scholastic Explications against the Doctrine it self, cc-acp av-j p-acp d n2 cc j n2, cst pns32 vhb av vvn av d n1 p-acp dt njp2, r-crq vhb vbn vvn cc vvn p-acp d j n2 p-acp dt n1 pn31 n1,
Note 0 Tunc igitur existentia naturae substantialis erit complete terminata quando suerit affecta modo existendi per se, hic ergo modus complet rationem subsistentiae creatae, ille ergo habet propriam rationem personalitatis seu suppositalitatis. Suarez Disp. Metaphys. 34. — Pestquam essentia est in actu, solum indiget modo existendi in se & per se declaratur ex incarnatione Christi, nihil enim aliud intelligimus deesse humanitati Christi, ut non subsistat subsistentiâ propriâ nisi talem existendi modum quo sit per se & non in alio, nam in ea est integra omnis essentia actualis & creata, & consequenter est etiam substantialis existentia humanae naturae, tamen quia illa existentia ita est affecta ut innitatur verbo, a quo sustentatur & pendet, ideo caret illa humanitas modo existendi per se, ergo solum ex defectu hujusmodi non est subsistens nec persona creata, ergo talis modus est qui babet rationem personalitatis creatae. Id quod suppositum creatum addit supra naturam, distinguitur quidem in re ab ipsâ naturâ, non tamen omnino realiter tanquam res a re, sed modaliter, ut modus rei a re. Est ergo substantia transcendenter sumpta ut distinguitur contra accidens (quia non potest substantia ab accidente formaliter accipere suum complementum) non tamen entitas sed modus substantialis, at { que } ita non directe sed reductive ponitur in praedicamento substantiae quia est aliquid substantiale. Suarez Metaphys. Disp. 34. Tunc igitur existentia naturae Substantialis erit complete terminata quando suerit affecta modo existendi per se, hic ergo modus complete rationem subsistentiae creatae, Isle ergo habet propriam rationem personalitatis seu suppositalitatis. Suarez Disp Metaphys. 34. — Pestquam Essentia est in Acts, solum indiget modo existendi in se & per se declaratur ex incarnation Christ, nihil enim Aliud intelligimus deesse Humanitati Christ, ut non subsistat subsistentiâ propriâ nisi talem existendi modum quo sit per se & non in Alio, nam in ea est Whole omnis Essentia actualis & Created, & Consequently est etiam Substantialis existentia humanae naturae, tamen quia illa existentia ita est affecta ut innitatur verbo, a quo sustentatur & Pendet, ideo caret illa humanitas modo existendi per se, ergo solum ex defectu hujusmodi non est subsistens nec persona Created, ergo Talis modus est qui babet rationem personalitatis creatae. Id quod suppositum Creatum Addit supra naturam, distinguitur quidem in re ab ipsâ naturâ, non tamen Omnino realiter tanquam Rest a re, sed modaliter, ut modus rei a re. Est ergo Substance transcendenter sumpta ut distinguitur contra Accidents (quia non potest Substance ab accident formaliter accipere suum complementum) non tamen entitas sed modus Substantialis, At { que } ita non Direct sed reductive ponitur in praedicamento substantiae quia est Aliquid substantial. Suarez Metaphys. Disp 34. fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la j fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la j fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 np1 np1. crd — fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la cc fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la, fw-la fw-la vvn fw-la n2 n1 np1, fw-la fw-fr fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la p-acp fw-la, fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la, cc jc fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, dt fw-la fw-la cc fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la. fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-it fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la uh fw-la fw-la fw-la dt zz, fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la dt zz. fw-la fw-la fw-la jc fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la (fw-la fw-fr fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la) fw-fr fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, p-acp { fw-fr } fw-la fw-fr vvb fw-la j fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la j j. np1 np1. np1 crd




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers