In-Text |
But the said corruptions of Doctrine have been shewed in the former Demonstrations. Therefore the Schisme is the Roman Church's, &c. 115. No question, if those corruptions of Doctrine have been really demonstrated, in which appeares not the least glimpse of evidence, no nor of probability neither: |
But the said corruptions of Doctrine have been showed in the former Demonstrations. Therefore the Schism is the Roman Church's, etc. 115. No question, if those corruptions of Doctrine have been really demonstrated, in which appears not the least glimpse of evidence, no nor of probability neither: |
p-acp dt j-vvn n2 pp-f n1 vhb vbn vvn p-acp dt j n2. av dt n1 vbz dt njp ng1, av crd dx n1, cs d n2 pp-f n1 vhb vbn av-j vvn, p-acp r-crq vvz xx dt ds n1 pp-f n1, uh-dx ccx pp-f n1 av-dx: |