In-Text |
Secondly, though oppressions should not be directly intended in the Text: yet might they be inferred from it by the rule of proportion and for the reason of equity. For where there is the same reason of equity, (as in the present case) although with some difference of proportion or degree; there is also the same obligation of duty, the said difference of proportion or degree still observed. |
Secondly, though oppressions should not be directly intended in the Text: yet might they be inferred from it by the Rule of proportion and for the reason of equity. For where there is the same reason of equity, (as in the present case) although with Some difference of proportion or degree; there is also the same obligation of duty, the said difference of proportion or degree still observed. |
ord, c-acp n2 vmd xx vbi av-j vvn p-acp dt n1: av vmd pns32 vbb vvn p-acp pn31 p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1 cc p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1. c-acp c-crq pc-acp vbz dt d vvb pp-f n1, (c-acp p-acp dt j n1) cs p-acp d n1 pp-f n1 cc n1; a-acp vbz av dt d n1 pp-f n1, dt j-vvn n1 pp-f n1 cc n1 av vvn. |