Romans 2.26 (Tyndale) |
romans 2.26: therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
for else circumcision had sealed an untruth, if a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
False |
0.704 |
0.181 |
0.147 |
Romans 2.26 (Geneva) |
romans 2.26: therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
for else circumcision had sealed an untruth, if a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
False |
0.696 |
0.176 |
0.165 |
Romans 4.10 (Geneva) |
romans 4.10: howe was it then imputed? when he was circumcised, or vncircumcised? not when he was cricumcised, but when he was vncircumcised. |
a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
True |
0.691 |
0.259 |
0.0 |
Romans 2.26 (Tyndale) |
romans 2.26: therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
True |
0.688 |
0.189 |
0.0 |
Romans 2.26 (AKJV) |
romans 2.26: therefore, if the vncircumcision keepe the righteousnesse of the law, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
True |
0.685 |
0.197 |
0.0 |
Romans 2.26 (Geneva) |
romans 2.26: therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
a man that should perform the condition, should not be justified though he be uncircumcised |
True |
0.679 |
0.179 |
0.0 |