In-Text |
Now is not God's Law as binding in what he bids, as in what he forbids his peculiar People? I know the former binds Semper, and the later ad Semper. But when they Both bind, they cannot but bind with an Aequality. Or is not his peremptory Command as obliging under the Gospel, as it was under the Law? Is not the Message of God as good, when dispatch'd to us Christians by S. Peter, and S. Paul, and by Christ himself, as when sent unto the Jews by a single Moses? Is not God the same Jehova to Them and Ʋs? and his Word as authentick in these last Times, |
Now is not God's Law as binding in what he bids, as in what he forbids his peculiar People? I know the former binds Semper, and the later and Semper. But when they Both bind, they cannot but bind with an Equality. Or is not his peremptory Command as obliging under the Gospel, as it was under the Law? Is not the Message of God as good, when dispatched to us Christians by S. Peter, and S. Paul, and by christ himself, as when sent unto the jews by a single Moses? Is not God the same Jehovah to Them and Ʋs? and his Word as authentic in these last Times, |
av vbz xx npg1 n1 p-acp vvg p-acp r-crq pns31 vvz, a-acp p-acp r-crq pns31 vvz po31 j n1? pns11 vvb dt j vvz fw-la, cc dt jc cc fw-la. p-acp c-crq pns32 d vvb, pns32 vmbx p-acp vvi p-acp dt n1. cc vbz xx po31 j vvb p-acp vvg p-acp dt n1, c-acp pn31 vbds p-acp dt n1? vbz xx dt n1 pp-f np1 p-acp j, c-crq vvn p-acp pno12 np1 p-acp np1 np1, cc np1 np1, cc p-acp np1 px31, c-acp c-crq vvd p-acp dt np2 p-acp dt j np1? vbz xx np1 dt d np1 p-acp pno32 cc n2? cc po31 n1 p-acp j p-acp d ord n2, |