| In-Text |
For the former part Echart the Lutheran, who wrote a peculiar book against Piscator in this controversie, doth therein (Resp. ad decim. Arg.) shew, That Piscator did disclaim that Argument (though most of his fellows fervently propugne it) and grants, That the Law doth require both of us; |
For the former part Echart the Lutheran, who wrote a peculiar book against Piscator in this controversy, does therein (Resp. ad decim. Argument) show, That Piscator did disclaim that Argument (though most of his Fellows fervently propugn it) and grants, That the Law does require both of us; |
p-acp dt j n1 np1 dt njp, r-crq vvd dt j n1 p-acp n1 p-acp d n1, vdz av (np1 fw-la fw-la. np1) vvb, cst n1 vdd vvi d n1 (c-acp ds pp-f po31 n2 av-j vvi pn31) cc vvz, cst dt n1 vdz vvi d pp-f pno12; |