In-Text |
That Baptism is the Ordidinance under the New Testament answering unto Circumcision in the Old, can any that observe the order of Gospel, the cessation of Circumcision, the regular succession of Baptism into its place, believe some initial Seal essential to Gospel administration, and see none established if Baptisme be excluded? and find Baptism in all things fully significant of what was signified by Circumcision, deny that Baptism is succeeded into the room, serves to the end that Circumcision did; |
That Baptism is the Ordinance under the New Testament answering unto Circumcision in the Old, can any that observe the order of Gospel, the cessation of Circumcision, the regular succession of Baptism into its place, believe Some initial Seal essential to Gospel administration, and see none established if Baptism be excluded? and find Baptism in all things Fully significant of what was signified by Circumcision, deny that Baptism is succeeded into the room, serves to the end that Circumcision did; |
cst n1 vbz dt n1 p-acp dt j n1 vvg p-acp n1 p-acp dt j, vmb d cst vvb dt n1 pp-f n1, dt n1 pp-f n1, dt j n1 pp-f n1 p-acp po31 n1, vvb d j n1 j p-acp n1 n1, cc vvb pix vvd cs n1 vbb vvn? cc vvb n1 p-acp d n2 av-j j pp-f r-crq vbds vvn p-acp n1, vvb d n1 vbz vvn p-acp dt n1, vvz p-acp dt n1 cst n1 vdd; |