Early English Printed Sermons


The vertue and value of baptism: in which the dignity and duty of [baptism], the due right of infants to [baptism], and their right above that of grown persons by [baptism], the degrading and destructive principles and practices of [baptism] are / catechetically propounded, plainly preached, and now published as an antidote to the baptism-despising dictates of John Simpson. By Zachariah Crofton ... ; Imprimatur, Edm. Calamy.

Crofton, Zachary, 1625 or 6-1672
Publisher: Printed by D M for J Nuthal living next door to the Dolphin in the Minories
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1658
Approximate Era: Interregnum
TCP ID: A80854 ESTC ID: R174314 STC ID: C7003B
Subject Headings: Baptism; Theology, Doctrinal;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 381 located on Image 28

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text but not different Seals, Col. 2.11, 12? Did not Circumcision seal the Covenant of Grace, I will be your God? is it not therefore called the Seal of the righteousness by Faith, Rom 4 11? Is not the propriety to the promise of Grace, Remission and Salvation the very ground entituling and encouraging to Baptisme as the Seal thereof, Act. 2.38, 39? And is not this agreement sufficient to demonstrate, that Baptism is now what Circumcision was of old to the Church? What if in some things these two Seals do differ, is the difference so essential as to deny the succession of the one to the other? It is true, the one was by blood, the other by water; but not different Seals, Col. 2.11, 12? Did not Circumcision seal the Covenant of Grace, I will be your God? is it not Therefore called the Seal of the righteousness by Faith, Rom 4 11? Is not the propriety to the promise of Grace, Remission and Salvation the very ground entitling and encouraging to Baptism as the Seal thereof, Act. 2.38, 39? And is not this agreement sufficient to demonstrate, that Baptism is now what Circumcision was of old to the Church? What if in Some things these two Seals do differ, is the difference so essential as to deny the succession of the one to the other? It is true, the one was by blood, the other by water; cc-acp xx j n2, np1 crd, crd? vdd xx n1 vvi dt n1 pp-f n1, pns11 vmb vbi po22 np1? vbz pn31 xx av vvn dt n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp n1, np1 crd crd? vbz xx dt n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1, n1 cc n1 dt j n1 vvg cc vvg p-acp n1 p-acp dt n1 av, n1 crd, crd? cc vbz xx d n1 j pc-acp vvi, cst n1 vbz av q-crq n1 vbds pp-f j p-acp dt n1? q-crq cs p-acp d n2 d crd n2 vdb vvi, vbz dt n1 av j c-acp pc-acp vvi dt n1 pp-f dt crd p-acp dt j-jn? pn31 vbz j, dt pi vbds p-acp n1, dt j-jn p-acp n1;




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: 1 Corinthians 12.13; Acts 2.38; Acts 2.39; Colossians 2.11; Colossians 2.12; Galatians 3.27; Galatians 3.27 (ODRV); Hebrews 9.18 (Geneva); Romans 12.5 (AKJV); Romans 4.11; Romans 6.4 (ODRV)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score
Hebrews 9.18 (Geneva) hebrews 9.18: wherefore neither was the first ordeined without blood. it is true, the one was by blood, the other by water True 0.644 0.493 0.0




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers
In-Text Col. 2.11, 12 Colossians 2.11; Colossians 2.12
In-Text Rom 4 11 Romans 4.11
In-Text Act. 2.38, 39 Acts 2.38; Acts 2.39