| In-Text |
He disputing with Bellarmine concerning the difference between the Law, and the Gospel, speaks as fully and plainly as any of the rest forenamed Protestant Divines, That the Law of Works doth propose salvation upon condition of fulfilling the Law. |
He disputing with Bellarmine Concerning the difference between the Law, and the Gospel, speaks as Fully and plainly as any of the rest forenamed Protestant Divines, That the Law of Works does propose salvation upon condition of fulfilling the Law. |
pns31 vvg p-acp np1 vvg dt n1 p-acp dt n1, cc dt n1, vvz a-acp av-j cc av-j c-acp d pp-f dt n1 j-vvn n1 vvz, cst dt n1 pp-f vvz vdz vvi n1 p-acp n1 pp-f vvg dt n1. |
| Note 0 |
Nos legis & Evangelii discrimen cum quaerimus utrumque nominare contracta illa significatione, secundum quam Paulus oponit legem operum, legi fidei. Hoc est, legem operum proponere salutem sub conditione legis per ficiendae. At legem fidei candem preponere, sub conditione tantum credendi in Christum: nimirum, ut u•rinque conditio sumatur codem sensu. Tom. 3. lib. 15. cap. 3. § 26. |
Nos Legis & Evangelii discrimen cum Seeking utrumque nominare contracta illa signification, secundum quam Paulus oponit legem Operum, Legi fidei. Hoc est, legem Operum proponere salutem sub condition Legis per ficiendae. At legem fidei candem preponere, sub condition Tantum credendi in Christ: Nimirum, ut u•rinque Condition sumatur codem sensu. Tom. 3. lib. 15. cap. 3. § 26. |
fw-la fw-la cc np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1, fw-la fw-la np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la. fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la. p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la p-acp np1: fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 crd n1. crd n1. crd § crd |