| In-Text |
whom he calls Presbyters in one place, he calls Bishops in the other. Once more, 1 Pet. 5, 1. The Elders which are among you. |
whom he calls Presbyters in one place, he calls Bishops in the other. Once more, 1 Pet. 5, 1. The Elders which Are among you. |
r-crq pns31 vvz n2 p-acp crd n1, pns31 vvz n2 p-acp dt n-jn. a-acp av-dc, crd np1 crd, crd dt n2-jn r-crq vbr p-acp pn22. |
| Note 0 |
Ex hoc loco manifestum, eosdem dici & suisse Episcopos, qui dicebantur & erant Presbyteri, alias nulla foret in Textu Apostolico connectio, quam tamen particula NONLATINALPHABET [ NONLATINALPHABET ] diserte ponit. Quae enim NONLATINALPHABET haec foret, Illi constituendi sunt Fresbyteri qui sunt sine crimine, quia Episcopum (cujus Officium, potestas, Jurisdictio & gradus differt a Presbyterio) oportet esse sine crimine? Ger. de Min. Eccles. From this place it is manifest, that the same Persons were both called and were Bishops, who were called and were Presbyters: Otherwise there would be no Connection in the Apostles Discourse; which yet the causal Particle [ for ] expresly asserts. For what coherence would this be, They are to be made Presbyters who are blameless, because a Bishop (whose Office, Power, Jurisdiction and Degree, is different from that of a Presbyter) ought to be blameless? |
Ex hoc loco Manifest, eosdem dici & suisse Episcopos, qui dicebantur & Erant Presbyteries, alias nulla foret in Textu Apostolico connectio, quam tamen Particula [ ] diserte Ponit. Quae enim haec foret, Illi constituendi sunt Fresbyteri qui sunt sine crimine, quia Bishop (cujus Officium, potestas, Jurisdiction & gradus Differt a Presbytery) oportet esse sine crimine? Ger. de Min. Eccles. From this place it is manifest, that the same Persons were both called and were Bishops, who were called and were Presbyters: Otherwise there would be no Connection in the Apostles Discourse; which yet the causal Particle [ for ] expressly asserts. For what coherence would this be, They Are to be made Presbyters who Are blameless, Because a Bishop (whose Office, Power, Jurisdiction and Degree, is different from that of a Presbyter) ought to be blameless? |
fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la cc fw-la np1, fw-fr fw-la cc fw-la np1, av fw-la n1 p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la [ ] vvi fw-la. fw-la fw-la fw-la n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la (fw-la fw-la, fw-la, np1 cc n1 vvn dt np1) fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la? np1 fw-fr np1 np1 p-acp d n1 pn31 vbz j, cst dt d n2 vbdr av-d vvn cc vbdr n2, r-crq vbdr vvn cc vbdr n2: av pc-acp vmd vbi dx n1 p-acp dt n2 vvb; r-crq av dt n1 n1 [ c-acp ] av-j n2. p-acp r-crq n1 vmd d vbi, pns32 vbr pc-acp vbi vvn n2 r-crq vbr j, c-acp dt n1 (rg-crq n1, n1, n1 cc n1, vbz j p-acp d pp-f dt n1) vmd p-acp vbi j? |
