A vindication of foure serious questions of grand importance, concerning excommunication and suspention from the sacrament of the Lords Supper, from some misprisions and unjust exceptions lately taken against them; both in the pulpit, by a reverend brother of Scotland, in a sermon at Margarets Church in Westminster, before the Honourable House of Commons, at a publike fast there held for Scotland, on the 5th of September last: and in the presse, by three new-printed pamphlets, by way of answer to, and censure of them. Wherein some scripture texts, (commonly reproduced for excommunication, and bare suspention from the Lords Supper onely,) are cleared from false glosses, inferences, conclusions wrested from them; ... / By William Prynne of Lincolns Inne, Esquire.
Prynne, William, 1600-1669
Publisher: Printed for John Macock for Michael Spark senior
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1645
Approximate Era: CivilWar
TCP ID: A91314 ESTC ID: R212424 STC ID: P4124
Subject Headings:
Excommunication;
Lord's Supper -- Church of Scotland;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 91 located on Page 5
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | and were more acceptable to Christ himselfe (who never excommunicated, but received and conversed with them) then the proud Pharises were, Luke 18. 11. to 15. ch. 3. 12. chap. 7. 29. chap. 5. 27. 28, 29. chap. 15. 1, 2. chap. 19. 2, &c. Mark 9. 11, 12. Matth. 10. 3. Marke 2. 15, 16. Therefore these expressions can no wayes warrant or imply any excommnnication or suspension from the Sacrament. | and were more acceptable to christ himself (who never excommunicated, but received and conversed with them) then the proud Pharisees were, Lycia 18. 11. to 15. changed. 3. 12. chap. 7. 29. chap. 5. 27. 28, 29. chap. 15. 1, 2. chap. 19. 2, etc. Mark 9. 11, 12. Matthew 10. 3. Mark 2. 15, 16. Therefore these expressions can no ways warrant or imply any excommnnication or suspension from the Sacrament. | cc vbdr av-dc j p-acp np1 px31 (r-crq av-x vvn, cc-acp vvd cc vvn p-acp pno32) cs dt j np2 vbdr, av crd crd p-acp crd n2. crd crd n1 crd crd n1 crd crd crd, crd n1 crd crd, crd n1 crd crd, av vvb crd crd, crd np1 crd crd n1 crd crd, crd av d n2 vmb dx n2 vvb cc vvi d n1 cc n1 p-acp dt n1. |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance: Luke 18.10 (Geneva); Luke 18.10 (ODRV); Luke 18.11; Mark 2.15; Mark 2.16; Mark 9.11; Mark 9.12; Matthew 10.3; Matthew 18.17 (Geneva)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | Luke 18. 11. | Luke 18.11 | |
| In-Text | Mark 9. 11, 12. | Mark 9.11; Mark 9.12 | |
| In-Text | Matth. 10. 3. | Matthew 10.3 | |
| In-Text | Marke 2. 15, 16. | Mark 2.15; Mark 2.16 |