Romans 7.7 (AKJV) |
romans 7.7: what shall wee say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. nay, i had not knowen sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.814 |
0.529 |
0.955 |
Romans 7.7 (Geneva) |
romans 7.7: what shall we say then? is the lawe sinne? god forbid. nay, i knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayd, thou shalt not lust. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.809 |
0.501 |
0.0 |
Romans 7.7 (ODRV) |
romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.797 |
0.599 |
2.095 |
Romans 7.7 (Vulgate) |
romans 7.7: quid ergo dicemus? lex peccatum est? absit. sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per legem: nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi lex diceret: non concupisces. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.794 |
0.181 |
0.0 |
Romans 7.7 (Tyndale) - 4 |
romans 7.7: for i had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.78 |
0.621 |
0.0 |
Romans 7.7 (AKJV) |
romans 7.7: what shall wee say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. nay, i had not knowen sinne, but by the lawe: for i had not knowen lust, except the law had said, thou shalt not couet. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom. 7. 7. and if reason in morals, those we mean which were natural and concreated, had not been dimmed and defaced, there would not have been any need in that respect, of the publication of the law, which was promulgated, that thereby we might know sin, rom. 3. 10. nay, |
False |
0.779 |
0.18 |
1.723 |
Romans 7.7 (ODRV) |
romans 7.7: what shal we say then? is the law sinne? god forbid. but sinne i did not know, but by the law: for concupiscence i knew not, vnlesse the law did day: thou shalt not couet. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom. 7. 7. and if reason in morals, those we mean which were natural and concreated, had not been dimmed and defaced, there would not have been any need in that respect, of the publication of the law, which was promulgated, that thereby we might know sin, rom. 3. 10. nay, |
False |
0.751 |
0.205 |
3.183 |
Romans 3.20 (Geneva) - 1 |
romans 3.20: for by the lawe commeth the knowledge of sinne. |
thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.749 |
0.573 |
0.0 |
Romans 3.20 (ODRV) - 1 |
romans 3.20: for by the law is the knowledge of sinne. |
thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.744 |
0.485 |
0.0 |
Romans 3.20 (AKJV) - 1 |
romans 3.20: for by the law is the knowledge of sinne. |
thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.744 |
0.485 |
0.0 |
Romans 3.20 (Tyndale) |
romans 3.20: for by the lawe commeth the knowledge of synne. |
thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.719 |
0.464 |
0.0 |
Romans 7.8 (Geneva) |
romans 7.8: but sinne tooke an occasion by ye commandement, and wrought in me all maner of concupiscence: for without the lawe sinne is dead. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.698 |
0.295 |
1.219 |
Romans 7.8 (AKJV) |
romans 7.8: but sinne taking occasion by the commaundement, wrought in me all maner of concupiscence. for without the law sinne was dead. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.684 |
0.384 |
2.063 |
Romans 7.8 (ODRV) |
romans 7.8: but occasion being taken, sinne by the commandement wrought in me al concupiscence. for without the law sinne was dead. |
for the apostle had never known concupiscence to be sin, if the law had not forbidden it # rom |
True |
0.68 |
0.362 |
2.063 |
Romans 3.20 (Tyndale) |
romans 3.20: for by the lawe commeth the knowledge of synne. |
and if reason in morals, those we mean which were natural and concreated, had not been dimmed and defaced, there would not have been any need in that respect, of the publication of the law, which was promulgated, that thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.677 |
0.202 |
0.0 |
Romans 7.7 (Geneva) - 3 |
romans 7.7: nay, i knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: |
thereby we might know sin, rom |
True |
0.669 |
0.363 |
0.0 |