In-Text |
What would it have done, if it had beene lapped up in Aenigmaticall Language, like this of Saint Paul? How would it have posed his Mastership, had it beene proposed in the Wonderment of a Riddle, or seeming contradiction? Yet in this Seeming Contradiction, we may plainely see the parts of Saint Pauls Conversion, |
What would it have done, if it had been lapped up in Enigmatical Language, like this of Saint Paul? How would it have posed his Mastership, had it been proposed in the Wonderment of a Riddle, or seeming contradiction? Yet in this Seeming Contradiction, we may plainly see the parts of Saint Paul's Conversion, |
q-crq vmd pn31 vhi vdn, cs pn31 vhd vbn vvn a-acp p-acp j n1, av-j d pp-f n1 np1? q-crq vmd pn31 vhb vvn po31 n1, vhd pn31 vbn vvn p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1, cc j-vvg n1? av p-acp d j-vvg n1, pns12 vmb av-j vvi dt n2 pp-f n1 npg1 n1, |
Note 1 |
Rationis humanae in mysteriis regni dei caecitas in Nicodemo apparet, cui omnia ista, quae de regeneratione proponuntur, absurda apparent. Theodoricus in Analys. Evangel. Domin. Trinit. 1 Cor. 15. 45. |
Rationis humanae in mysteriis Regni dei caecitas in Nicodemo Appears, cui omnia ista, Quae de regeneration proponuntur, absurda apparent. Theodoricus in Analysis. Evangel. Domini. Trinity. 1 Cor. 15. 45. |
fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-fr n1 fw-la, fw-la j. np1 p-acp np1. np1. np1. j. crd np1 crd crd |