In-Text |
but only to call it, Impudent madnesse. Whether he might not with reason haue called it so, iudge your for what els can it be, to deny that to be the true sense of our Sauiours words, which all Fathers & Councels haue professed to be the true and lawfull sense of them? But you (to haue a better colour of inueighing against Baronius) say, that he calls the exposition of Protestants Impudent madnes, which is not true: |
but only to call it, Impudent madness. Whither he might not with reason have called it so, judge your for what Else can it be, to deny that to be the true sense of our Saviour's words, which all Father's & Counsels have professed to be the true and lawful sense of them? But you (to have a better colour of inveighing against Baronius) say, that he calls the exposition of Protestants Impudent madness, which is not true: |
cc-acp av-j pc-acp vvi pn31, j n1. cs pns31 vmd xx p-acp n1 vhb vvn pn31 av, vvb po22 c-acp q-crq av vmb pn31 vbi, pc-acp vvi cst pc-acp vbi dt j n1 pp-f po12 ng1 n2, r-crq d n2 cc n2 vhb vvn pc-acp vbi dt j cc j n1 pp-f pno32? p-acp pn22 (pc-acp vhi dt jc n1 pp-f vvg p-acp np1) vvb, cst pns31 vvz dt n1 pp-f n2 j n1, r-crq vbz xx j: |