In-Text |
How then do you proue that S. Peter (who call's the Priesthood of the new testament a kingly Priesthood had not a triple Miter or Crowne as his Successor now hath? (though not so rich, by reason of the pouerty in which the Church at those her first beginnings was) especially since S. Hierome treating of the Sacerdotall Ornaments of the law of Moyses, affirmeth, that in Christ they are more perfectly consummated. |
How then do you prove that S. Peter (who call's the Priesthood of the new Testament a kingly Priesthood had not a triple Miter or Crown as his Successor now hath? (though not so rich, by reason of the poverty in which the Church At those her First beginnings was) especially since S. Jerome treating of the Sacerdotal Ornament of the law of Moses, Affirmeth, that in christ they Are more perfectly consummated. |
uh-crq av vdb pn22 vvi d n1 np1 (r-crq vvz dt n1 pp-f dt j n1 dt j n1 vhd xx dt j n1 cc n1 p-acp po31 n1 av vhz? (cs xx av j, p-acp n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp r-crq dt n1 p-acp d po31 ord n2 vbds) av-j p-acp n1 np1 vvg pp-f dt j n2 pp-f dt n1 pp-f np1, vvz, cst p-acp np1 pns32 vbr av-dc av-j vvn. |